- Bliss
- Shout
- YM
- Teen Vogue
To what extent should magazines be held responsible for the social ramifications of the representations they offer?
Many say that magazines should be held responsible for the social ramifications because the influence of them on teenagers are clearly visible. Within the five of the teenage magazines that I have studied, the elements of beauty and fashion and even relationships are clearly noticeable, yet the target audience for the five magazines are between the age of 12 to 16. YM magazine even crossed the line with the tagline of "Friends with benefits", seeing as the legal age for sexual intercourse is 16, which is only twenty percent of the target audience. The magazines are said to have led the teenagers to think that they will have to look their best all the time. On the front of the YM magazine, it also mentioned how to "get sexy, shiny hair", are such words like 'sexy' even suitable to be associated with teenagers? Due to articles like these, teenage girls feel like they have to modify their image to feel normal and fit into the society. The fact that the models on the front covers are all famous celebrities who are photo-shopped to have flawless skin and slender figures pressures the target audience to feel like they must make themselves as good looking as the celebrities. Even know teenage girls know that the models were airbrushed, they would still aim to achieve looking beautiful in order to feel that they are accepted in the society by spending money on expensive skin products, going on diets which might eventually lead to anorexia - a detestable eating disorder that is popular amongst teenage girls. The colour pink can be seen on all 5 of the magazine covers, it is a colour that associateswith girls at any age, which clearly shows the target audience for these magazines, Furthermore, although these magazines are all obviously representing girls, teenage boys are also represented from the many articles on tips and advices on relationship with boys. The tagline in Shout magazine of "What lads really think!" creates stereotype on teenage boys, which the article is most likely to represent only a small proportion of them. Surely all relationships are different and incomparable, so why should there be articles like that which not only create steorotypes on boys but also make girls appear shallow?
However, a few people argue that the magazines should not be held responsible for the influence it has on teenagers. Although magazines are said to have a negative effect on teenage girls, it is the reader's own decision to make the purchase. Magazines are said not to be the cause of the social ramifications, but the influence instead. I believe magazines should be held responsible for the social ramifications of the representations they offer to a certain extent. In order to create a more suitable magazine for teenage girls, I think there should be a minimal amount of articles that relates to sex, but more articles on staying safe at parties and outings.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews/4990907/Teen-magazines-are-sexualising-readers-says-watchdog.html
http://voices.yahoo.com/popular-teen-magazines-their-possible-effect-on-35176.html?cat=25




